Tottenham Hotspur 1-0 Crystal Palace - Tactical Analysis

Written by Alfie Davis

A little later than planned, here's Alfie Davis' review of the Tottenham performance. 

Townsend WBA

A game where we were bound to be on the back foot from the start, trips to White Hart Lane are always a difficult task. Further fitness setbacks saw Cabaye and Tomkins on the bench, as Pardew named an almost unchanged side from the opening day. Joe Ledley came into the fold following the departure of Jedinak, and it was clear that we were happy to sit back, allowing Spurs the majority of possession. Consequently, we found it difficult to forge worthwhile possession and often resorted to laborious, slow passing around the back four until we’d eventually succumb to a long ball due to pressure from the opposition forwards.

Barrages of shots at the Palace goal were kept out by a lively Wayne Hennessy, with Tottenham's forwards Janssen and Kane squandering numerous chances to put their side into the lead –arguably we were fortunate not to have conceded more goals, as our back line found it difficult to nullify the what seemed constant threat of a positive Tottenham side.

Despite being buoyed by the signing of Christian Benteke, chances were hard to come by for the Eagles. Jason Puncheon found some space outside the penalty area after Zaha managed to tee him up nicely, but his low shot at goal was straight at Vorm. Then, a glorious chance for Yohan Cabaye late in the match should have arguably been on target, as we found it hard to get into the correct positions to have shots on goal.

The tactical approach from Pardew was to soak up the pressure and, when they'd commit too many men forward, hit them with on the counter attack. However, the Spurs defence marshalled our forwards consistently and, for periods weren't troubled at all. A performance that doesn’t show positive signs following the opening day defeat – however, there was no expectation to take away any points and shouldn’t be a reflection on how our side will perform from here forth.

With more players to come into our starting 11, there's reason to be optimistic and no judgements should be made until we’ve seen our side at full strength. Conversely, build up play seems laborious at present and on the ball we lack the forward intent required to thrive in the premier league. As we expect Benteke to start in the next game, there's hope that perhaps Pardew will take a completely different approach to the game - I'm hoping for two up front.

 

 

A game where we were bound to be on the back foot from the start, trips to White Hart Lane are always a difficult task. Further fitness setbacks saw Cabaye and Tomkins on the bench, as Pardew named an almost unchanged side from the opening day. Joe Ledley came into the fold following the departure of Jedinak, and it was clear that we were happy to sit back, allowing Spurs the majority of possession. Consequently, we found it difficult to forge worthwhile possession and often resorted to laborious, slow passing around the back four until we’d eventually succumb to a long ball due to pressure from the opposition forwards.

Barrages of shots at the Palace goal were kept out by a lively Wayne Hennessy, with Tottenham's forwards Janssen and Kane squandering numerous chances to put their side into the lead –arguably we were fortunate not to have conceded more goals, as our back line found it difficult to nullify the what seemed constant threat of a positive Tottenham side.

Despite being buoyed by the signing of Christian Benteke, chances were hard to come by for the Eagles. Jason Puncheon found some space outside the penalty area after Zaha managed to tee him up nicely, but his low shot at goal was straight at Vorm. Then, a glorious chance for Yohan Cabaye late in the match should have arguably been on target, as we found it hard to get into the correct positions to have shots on goal.

The tactical approach from Pardew was to soak up the pressure and, when they'd commit too many men forward, hit them with on the counter attack. However, the Spurs defence marshalled our forwards consistently and, for periods weren't troubled at all. A performance that doesn’t show positive signs following the opening day defeat – however, there was no expectation to take away any points and shouldn’t be a reflection on how our side will perform from here forth.

With more players to come into our starting 11, there's reason to be optimistic and no judgements should be made until we’ve seen our side at full strength. Conversely, build up play seems laborious at present and on the ball we lack the forward intent required to thrive in the premier league. As we expect Benteke to start in the next game, there's hope that perhaps Pardew will take a completely different approach to the game - I'm hoping for two up front.

Tottenham 1-0 Crystal Palace: Five Things We Learned

Written by Naveed Khan

Palace falter against Tottenham thanks to a late goal from Victor Wanyama - here are 5 things Naveed Khan learned from the game. 

Cabaye Glare 

1) Pre-season seems ongoing

Two games into the season, and the team line-up does not include new signing Mandanda (an unused player in the Euros), Cabaye (who played a grand total of 91 minutes) and Tomkins (albeit following an injury) but does include others who played regularly in Euro2016 suggests that the club had a disjointed pre-season.

At White Hart Lane, the team seemed disorganised at the back, allowed Tottenham to create too many openings and with the ball, Palace created little. The performance seemed more like a game to get up to speed and a desire to win points.

2) Wickham is a conundrum

On the face of it, Conor Wickham has all of the attributes needed for a striker at this level. He is big, strong yet has a burst of pace, covers a lot of ground and a ferocious shot. But, whether it is down to the team’s style of play, shortcomings or the result of years of Wickham himself being deployed out on the wing, he does not receive the ball enough in the box.

On Saturday, out of 32 touches, he had just one in the penalty area. While service is clearly an issue, his positional play also needs development – the attached image shows the lack of touches he had in central areas.

3) Cabaye the heartbeat

In half a game, Yohan Cabaye showed how integral he is to our team. Coming on for Joe Ledley at half-time, Cabaye’s introduction invigorated the team through some spells, was a link between the lines and looked to get the wide players and Lee involved more. He was somewhat curtailed by not have a solid base around him to enable him to pull the team forward but his importance to the team’s style was evident. The obvious question was, if fit to come on for half a game, why he was not used from the start?

4) Jedi the player needs replacing 

Much has been said about his leadership qualities but the loss at Spurs demonstrated that we miss a player in his style; someone to shield the back four, win the ball and move it on.

While a fully fit Cabaye and McArthur will rightly be our first choice central midfield, some games will call for a bit more bite and that is not Ledely’s natural game and of the other players Pardew spoke about as central midfield solutions – Lee, Mutch and Puncheon, none of them is a ball winner. The squad needs one.

5) Benteke part of the solution, not the whole solution

Christian Benteke is a very good Premier League striker; his record shows as much. However, he is not the sort who can make things happen without any service and while he is probably the best striker we could sign, he is not the complete solution to the team’s woes. 

While we can expect him to be the focal point the team has been missing, our desired upturn in fortunes cannot rest solely on his shoulders. This may explain why, despite being a record signing by some distance, fans are still concerned about other signings. 

Agree or disagree? Comment below!

Follow Nav on Twitter! 

Liverpool fans give us an honest assessment of Christian Benteke's move to Palace

Written by FYP Fanzine

It's actually happened! Christian Benteke has joined Palace, but how will he do? We get the lowdown from legendary Liverpool podcast The Anfield Wrap.


1. Christian Benteke arrived at Anfield with a great reputation as a goalscorer - what happened last season?

He arrived with a reputation as a goalscorer, but he also arrived with a reputation as a player that thrives on crosses and many expressed doubts about how he would fit in at Liverpool. The doubters were proved right on the evidence of last season but even given what was a season to forget for him, he still managed 10 goals in 42 appearances (22 as a substitute).

Many of those goals were crucial too in terms of winning points. I think it was a strange one for him in that the manager who bought him – Brendan Rodgers – was sacked by October. Had Rodgers had the chance to continue, maybe Benteke would have had more opportunity to integrate, not least as it was a player he had pushed Liverpool to pay £32.5m for. As it was, under Klopp, it was clear the player wasn’t at the forefront of his thinking.

2. What would you say are his strengths?

Aerial strength is the obvious answer, as is his power. He’s also a confident finisher on his day. We saw that confidence fade away at Liverpool and his finishing suffered as a result, but if you look at some of his finishes earlier in the season, he scored an absolute worldie at Old Trafford, he finished coolly at Stamford Bridge when it would have been easy to snatch at the chance and he scored another belter against Bordeaux. He’s alright on penalties, too…but you know that!

3. What are his weaknesses?

Based on his time at Liverpool, a feeling that he isn’t ruthless enough. But again, in his defence, that may be a confidence issue. He missed a few sitters last season, which didn’t help in winning over fans. Benteke also seems to be a force to be reckoned with when he has the bit between his teeth and is determined to make a point. We saw ‘angry Benteke’ a few times with good effect - he probably needs to find that version of himself more often when he takes to the pitch.

4. How do you think a team needs to play to make the most use of him?

Fairly simple one that, provide good crosses into the box. He thrives on them. I think if a team is set up to suit him, and he is happy and in the right place mentally, he is a force to be reckoned with. He can score different types of goal, too – he’s a decent poacher, as well as being capable of the spectacular.

5. He seems to have fallen out with Klopp - is that indicative of a character flaw or just a difference of opinion?

I’m not sure they fell out as such – more that they frustrated each other. Benteke didn’t seem to follow Klopp’s instructions at times, and that’s why we saw some on-pitch histrionics from the manager aimed his way. Benteke also had the clichéd whinge while on international duty about his situation. I don’t think that’s particularly something to worry about though.

It’s more concerning when a player is happy to just pick up wages regardless of whether he is in the team or not. Benteke wanted and expected more game time and that’s not unreasonable.

6. What do you expect of Benteke at Palace? Do you think it'll click?

Don’t see why not. He’s hard to stop on his day and played regularly he will get goals. I’m sure Alan Pardew is desperate to coach his ‘diving’ out of him, too! (Sorry, couldn’t resist).


Crystal Palace 0-1 West Brom Tactical Analysis

Written by Alfie Davis

What went wrong for Palace against West Brom? Here's Alfie Davis with a tactical breakdown...

With Palace fans in transfer meltdown, Pardew’s promise of a ‘transitional period’ can either excite fans or leave them dreading a long season – and if the latest result is anything to go by, things do look pretty dismal.

A visit from a stubborn West Brom side was always going to force our hand to come out and play more expansive possession football, actually building from the back instead of relying on the counter attack.

Pardew decided to deploy Jason Puncheon in a deeper midfield role to compensate for Cabaye’s absence in the starting line-up, but we often lacked the cutting edge to pick out key passes in the final third, which proved costly in the end.

Playing at Selhurst against teams of similar ilk puts pressure on our side, and doesn’t allow us to play to our strengths; instead of building from the back into the midfielders, we often seem to opt for a long ball from Delaney.

This sort of play was never going to be troublesome for a Pulis side who arguably have more prowess in the air and as a result, possession was often squandered. For a side that want to move to a style of play more like Barcelona, we do not look anywhere near comfortable enough on the ball to actually play this way and cause problems for sides in the Premier League.

The team arguably wasn’t at full strength, and starter Lee Chung Yong was surprisingly positive - despite reports of rifts between himself and Pardew in May.

The biggest criticism of Palace is that we don’t score enough goals, and Wickham really was unable to have any influence on the game at all. His hold up play isn’t the worst, but perhaps he just lacks the cutting edge or experience to lead a forward line on his own.

Pardew’s reluctance in the past to deploy two strikers has often angered many, but judging by the midfield and striking options available of late, it really doesn’t seem plausible unless signings are made and Pardew is having a dilemma in terms of how we should be playing football with the players we have.



On a positive note, a competitive debut of Andros Townsend did show glimmers of how he can influence the course of a game. In contrast to Bolasie and Zaha, Townsend offers more threat towards the goal itself and, despite not materialising in this game, has proven he can give us a whole new dimension in getting goals.

It perhaps was too soon for Andros however, as despite looking lively he wasn’t sharp enough to take his chances. Zaha also had a frustrating game as he probably should have put us into the lead – the chance he had was one of the very few times we broke free past the West Brom back four, proving that our squad right now is generally better at playing on the break.

One game down, Bolasie gone and no singings made – Pardew has a lot to think about, and maybe this ‘transition’ isn’t going to bode well for the squad at all.

Thoughts on Palace's tactics? Comment below...


Will Christian Benteke be a success at Palace? We ask Liverpool and Aston Villa fans

Written by Robert Sutherland

Liverpool and Villa fans obviously have very different views of Christian Benteke but after the Belgian's £30m move to Palace (yes, really!) we asked them both for their views on how he'll get on at Selhurst.

Aston Villa 

Well Palace I am currently rather jealous. You have signed a very exciting player who has the ability to win games for you single handedly. If it weren't for the big man we would of been relegated 3/4 seasons ago. He could be the perfect signing for you with the service from Townsend, Bolasie, Zaha or Sako he will be frightening.

Obviously you get his ariel ability where he very dangerous but what he doesn't get the credit for which he deserves is his technical ability and he is a brutal finisher of the ball. Demonstrated against Palace in December 2014 pinching the ball off of Scott Dann and curling the ball past the keeper.

Brendan Rodgers bringing him to Anfield was always a very strange move. Not just for him but for Liverpool. He was never fit for that club. First of all, LFC don't play with out and out wingers so he was constantly starved of service. Secondly, the pressure for him to bring instant success was huge at anfield and he had big boots to fill with Liverpool after losing Luis Suarez and he is a totally different to the stereotypical Liverpool striker i.e. Dalglish, Fowler, Owen, Torres and Suarez.

Christian thrives on being the main man. At Villa we relied so much on him with the correct service he is brilliant. Mark Albrighton assisting him on a regular occurrence who shows many similarities to Wilfried Zaha with raw pace and good deliver.

You guys owe Mr Pardew a pat on the back and I hope he tears Liverpool to pieces in front of the Kop for you next season. 

By Aston Villa Blog

Liverpool

Big Bad Ben arrived at Anfield with a reputation and a price tag to match. Many Liverpool fans had witnessed firsthand just how devastating he could be as he terrorised the Reds backline on more than one occasion while he was at Villa. A dominant centre forward on his day, he was bought with the intention of being Liverpool's very own Didier Drogba.

He was always going to be up against it though because, despite having a variety of strengths, he's fairly limited and to really get the best out of him you need to play to his strengths. Liverpool were never going to tweak their tactics enough to completely suit the striker due to the fact it would have stunted both Philippe Coutinho and Roberto Firmino.

On his day he's unplayable. It's just unfortunate for him that in the Red of Liverpool those days were scarce. He did get to showcase his talents in a win against Chelsea. In the game against the former Benteke came off the bench when the score was 1-1 and it was his introduction that turned the game at Stamford Bridge. Liverpool took the lead after a Mamadou Sakho pass from deep saw Benteke peel off to the edge of the area, bully John Terry in the air, knock the ball down into Coutinho's path and the Brazilian fired home. The Belgian rounded off the win with the third goal having picked the ball up just inside the area, power past three Chelsea defenders and calmly fire the ball home. He looked like a £32.5 million player in that cameo appearance as he battered the Chelsea defence.

Although his season at Liverpool is seen as underwhelming due to the lofty expectations that go hand in hand with playing for a club with such expectations his goals did earn the club 16 points in the Premier League. He also scored the winner in five matches last season and that was in a team not playing to his strengths. His stats at Liverpool are almost identical to those at Villa. He scored a goal every 167 minutes he was on the pitch.

Liverpool's build up last season was slow and pedestrian, not many got many players played ahead of Benteke when the team transitioned defence into attack. If he plays in a team suited to his style, one that puts crosses in the box, makes use of his aerial dominance but one that doesn't isolate him and has players supporting him when the ball is played up, then he's bound to score you goals. He's one of the few players in the league that can almost guarantee them. With players like Zaha, Bolasie, Townsend and Puncheon playing around and beyond him they all could be a handful. He's also more than capable of making the most of Cabaye set-pieces. On paper it's a match made in heaven.

By Sam McGuire


Crystal Palace 0-1 West Brom: Who was the Star Man?

Written by Callum Lane

Not a good start to the season on Saturday but who was Palace's Star Man against the Baggies? Callum Lane tries to work it out...

A new season and it looks like normal service has been resumed at Selhurst Park this year. Strange tactical changes from Pardew, silly fouls being given away which of course led to us conceding a goal.

But as much as it is unbearably frustrating to lose on the opening day let us try and pick out the positives.

The point of this article is to pick a StarMman; our best player on the day. Although some may think that this is about as easy as walking a tightrope blindfolded, it is actually pretty easy.

When you have to endure a game as bad as Saturday's, the moments of talent, be that very short are contrasting factors. The wing play from Andros Townsend and Wilf Zaha looked promising and the relentlessness of Lee Chung-yong playing in between the two kept West Brom uncomfortable, yet on the ball Palace lacked the cutting edge, the difference between winning and losing a game.

For me, the star man has to be Chungy.

Playing in the place of Bolasie, he still managed to put up a good show in the dullest of dull games. When he was on the ball Palace looked like turning their dreary attacks in to something which could lead to a goal.

Zaha played well but he managed to show off his main trait in spectacular style, be that not being able to finish, denied by Foster twice within seconds, the first should of been scored and the second should of been set back to Townsend. The debutant also showed promise, but failed to really inspire any attacks.

Although the result has dampened my new season spirits, we can't let it set the tone for the season ahead. Even though we've lost our probably most threatening asset and will end up saying farewell to one of our greatest captains, we must remember that is the joy of being a Palace fan, never at any other club is a fan used to so much crisis that it's almost seen as normal.

However there's still time in the transfer, there's still time for the squad to shape into a well oiled machine, and hopefully there isn't enough time for Pardew to sub off Souare in the 92nd minute for Kelly.

Agree/disagree with Callum? Comment below...