Hodgson Is Still the Man for Palace but Needs to Make a Change

Written by Jack Snell

A lack of goals, creativity and intensity has contributed to, yet another, poor start to a season in the top flight. Roy Hodgson has cast his damning hand of blame on the lack of options from the bench and injuries to key players, however, as manager of an underachieving side, he too should be held accountable.

“You don´t change a winning team” is a widely used cliché in the game. It is quoted on a regular basis due to it being a logical approach to team selection. However, Hodgson seems to operate on the basis of the opposite: “You don´t change a losing team either.” For such an underwhelming start to the campaign, Roy has resisted change.

He makes minor alterations to the team but only when his hand is forced. When selecting a team, it is reminiscent of someone playing FIFA; picking the players with the highest rating and crowbarring them into the starting line-up. The most recent starting-11 selections are objectively Palace´s strongest individual players (out of those who are fit) but in following this principle it produces a team consisting of four defenders and six midfielders, four of which prefer a central role.

READ MORE: Zaha's Diving Accusers fit into Three Categories

Yes, on paper it is the “best team available,” but when taking other factors into the equation, it can weaken the team as a whole and, as the league table suggests, that exact scenario is transpiring. 

This is nothing out of the ordinary for Hodgson. Last season saw Ruben Loftus-Cheek as a winger and since he was played out of position, the England International delivered an underwhelming 12 crosses all season. Let that sink in for a second… 12 crosses from a player on the wing.

Luckily, Loftus-Cheek made up for this in other areas, but playing central midfielders on the wing can stifle certain areas of the game. Following the exact same blueprint is simply not working since Loftus-Cheek and Yohan Cabaye departed; Cheikou Kouyate and Max Meyer are not the same breed of player.

Instead of adapting the formation or tactics to suit the new arrivals, his robust 4-4-2 formation has subtly switched to an extremely narrow 4-2-2-2. The lack of width means Palace try to play “eye of the needle” passes in their build up play. A style of football that has never been synonymous of the Eagles. It also creates the bizarre circumstance where the widest players on the pitch are the two strikers.

LISTEN: FYP Podcast EXTRAAA - Palace lose at West Ham and it's the same old problems

This leaves a gaping, "Benteke-shaped-hole" between the two opposition centre-backs. With no natural target man in the box, Palace´s attacking play has been predictable and riddled with unenforced errors. Hodgson may not have the desired options on the bench, but the players on the pitch are collectively under-performing. This is usually a sign of a larger issue than simply a few players “having a bad run of form.”

Hodgson will continue to absolve himself of any responsibility for the lack of progress and instead, suggest the question “what you would do differently?” It is a head stretcher that most Palace fans cannot unanimously agree upon, since there is not an obvious answer. Hodgson´s hands are somewhat tied in regards to his striking options; the consequence of lazy recruitment over the past few seasons has started to rear its ugly head. There is an issue regarding personnel, but this should not be the crutch that Hodgson leans on after every poor performance.

The paradoxically frustrating aspect is that Palace´s outing against Burnley demonstrates that this system can work. This sort of dominance is evidence Hodgson can use to persuade the team and the fans that victories can come with this setup. The only issue is that this performance was an anomaly, as this sort of dynamism has not been displayed since the Fulham fixture. A team with more ability could have punished Palace for all the squandered chances.

If anyone can turn this around, it is Hodgson. But a change of approach and mentality could be the answer, since the solution is not sitting on the bench… and he will remind the fans of the limited bench at every moment possible.


Palace Ponderings - 2-0 Win Doesn't Tell the Whole Dominant Story

Written by Naveed Khan

Palace took Burnley to task with an impressive team performance. Naveed Khan has some thoughts. 

Meyer Burnley

1 – Meyer Comes to Life

It took until December, but the hype around summer signing Max Meyer finally saw some justification as the German international ran the show against Burnley. Starting nominally on the left of a narrow midfielder four, his qualities were apparent. Keen to receive the ball, always looking for an attacking option, disciplined in his defensive duties and importantly, took away the reliance the team has on Wilfried Zaha to carry the ball.

This was the first Premier League game in which he has started where Palace were looking to play on the front foot, and it showed. Perhaps Roy Hodgson’s paced introduction of Meyer can be vindicated somewhat; the hope is this is not a one-off and he can be impactful going forward. The chemistry between Max and Wilf was apparent.

Celebrate goal

2 – Formation Talk Superfluous

It’s been talked about in the stands, on social media and even in previous ‘Palace Ponderings’, but when the players are playing with the confidence and fluidity they did against Burnley, all talk of formation and Roy’s 4-4-2 is superfluous. Certainly when defending, there is a structure akin to 4-4-2, but there isn’t going forward. James McArthur and Meyer often created a midfield box, playing central ahead of Luka Milivojević and Cheikhou Kouyaté.

The full-backs took advantage of this and often played as wing-backs. Wilf and Andros Townsend, nominally ‘strikers’ but both taking turns to attack between centre-backs and full-backs. This fluidity enabled the creation of space and chances and was a dynamic approach against Burnley’s rigidity. The key was the shape recovery – the lining back up as 4-4-2 when the ball was lost. That was an issue for stop-start performances earlier in the season but was critical in the best runs of form last season and was back again on Saturday.

Townsend clap

3 – Andros and Jimmy Back

It was great to see both Andros and McArthur get on the scoresheet on Saturday; albeit with very different goals. While the team has been finding its feet slowly this season, neither has hit the form they showed last term where they both made essential contributions to our survival. Playing wide midfield, McArthur was at his best, getting involved in all areas and free to support attacks – he has the team mindset to not do at the detriment of shape. He was able to contribute in ways he could not playing centrally.

Much has been said about Townsend’s lack of end product, but he has grown into this season and came out of Saturday’s game with an assist (in a way showing to fragility of assist statistics) and a contender for goal of the season. It’s been said they both need to contribute more – Saturday showed the benefit of them both being on their game.

HF flag

4 – Final Ponderings

Wherever you stand on the issues around the introduction of the Singing Section, it was evident even before kick-off that the Holmesdale Fanatics being back in Block B was vital in creating an atmosphere which was lacking this season. The midfield pivot of Milivojevic and Kouyate seems to be getting stronger each game, with the Serbian’s presence allowing Kouyate to move forward as needed and Kouyate allowing his teammate to play a more familiar role; the pivot is what will enable our attacking play to flourish.

James Tomkins and Mamadou Sakho were imperious on Saturday, assured in defence, always looking to push the team up and their partnership is up there with the best Palace have had in the Premier League era. Either as individuals or a pair, it is unlikely we could do better at centre back.

Wayne Hennessey Needs to Show that his Form is Permanent to Prove His Class

Written by Carl Mortimer

Wayne Hennessey's form this season has been impressive. But Carl Mortimer asks, are we seeing a permanent change in his performances? 

Wayne warmup

Congratulations Wayne Hennessey -- winner of the Player of the Month for November, an award that is definitely deserved based on his performances this season.

It’s hard to deny that he’s been one of our most consistent performers this season and in some people’s eyes he’s already on his way to winning the Player of the Season award, but is that all he’s been? Consistent?

Whether it was his poor handling of shots, poor reactions, poor distribution, not coming for crosses in the six-yard box, the shuffle left at free-kicks, not talking to his defence in seasons gone by, watching Hennessey play was painful at times. And it’s no secret that when Roy Hodgson came in, he wanted him replaced.

For far too long now, all we’ve wanted is for Hennessey to be consistent. However, is that change down to him finally knuckling down or is it anything to do with Dean Kiely and/or Vicente Guaita coming in?

It’s evident that Kiely has vastly helped Wayne improve his game as under previous coaches he struggled, which is why fans were calling for his head at times. It's also no secret that Guaita was brought in to be our number one and since then Hennessey has arguably excelled.

Hennessey catch

LISTEN: FYP Podcast EXTRAAA - Palace get their first points at Old Trafford ever in Premier League

But is this just a patch of form or has the Welsh number one definitely turned the corner in his Premier League career? It’s hard to say for certain, but you can understand why some fans are still sceptical.

Hennessey has a history of under-performing for the club over the years and some fans (myself included) think it’s only a matter of time that, for one reason or another, we'll see the Hennessey of old again, so let’s get Guaita in before it’s too late.

I look at it like this, would Manchester United keep playing Lee Grant if he was in a good run of form? No, they’d play De Gea in the long term because he’s evidently a better all round goalkeeper. He’s a step up in class.

Before we get carried away, in no way am I saying that Guaita is going to be our saviour, but if you caught any of his performances last season in La Liga you will have seen a major difference in class between him and our current number one.

Hennessey penalty save

READ MORE: Steve Parish opens up about the new singing section, Palace transfers, the main stand and more

Guaita has made over 100 appearances for Valencia and was the third-best performing keeper in Spain last year, keeping 12 clean sheets and conceding only 26 goals to help Getafe to an 8th place finish.

And don’t forget, we could’ve signed him last January but Palace decided against it after Getafe kept stalling on the transfer fee, putting Palace into a position where they offered Guaita a pre-contract which, in effect, gave Hennessey six months to knuckle down and improve before the arrival of the Spaniard. And he’s no doubt done that.

But again, is it a major improvement or has he just cut out those silly mistakes that were costing the club points?

Some argue you can still see faults in his game and that he’s just getting the rub of the green at the moment, while others can see a vast improvement.

There’s the saying 'form is temporary, class is permanent.' Is Wayne class, or is it just temporary form? Would any other team in the Premier League want him as their number one?

It’s not that I want Hennessey to fail, if he keeps this up over the course of the season and ends up with POTY I’ll congratulate him again.

But, can he keep this level of consistency up? God I hope so. Not just for Crystal Palace, but for the sake of Twitter and the BBS.


 

Palace Ponderings - Defeat at Chelsea is a hard pill to swallow

Written by FYP Fanzine

Defeat for Palace at Chelsea on Sunday but what did we learn? Here are 5 things to ponder...

1) Palace miss a natural striker

Whataver you think of Wilf and Andros up top (arguably Palace's best pairing up front last season) Roy Hodgson's side clearly miss a natural striker. There were moments at Stamford Bridge where Zaha and PVA both got away down the left and sent in inviting balls into the box...to no-one. A proper, natural, striker would have been waiting there for that.

I'm not saying that striker is Benteke, I'm not saying it's Ayew (I'm definitely not saying it's Sorloth) but someone, somewhere needs to be that man up top who can add end product to the chances that the likes of Wilf create.

Having said that, Zaha is clearly going to be asked to be played as a forward by Hodgson this season. He was a striker in his youth days so it isn't an unfamiliar role to him, but he does have a tendency to drift wide at times during games (often to try and make things happen.

Clearly, Roy still isn't quite sure of his best lineup going forward, and has been dealt big blows with injuries, but he needs to find a solution to that quickly or games like Sunday's will slip away due to a lack of decisiveness in the final third.

LISTEN: FYP Podcast EXTRAAA - Palace lose at Chelsea and can't defend set pieces

2) Defensive slackness is a worry

Down the other end of the pitch, Palace fans have become used to the Eagles being at the very least defensively assured and arguably are currently fielding their best ever back-four (no, Wayne, not back five).

But on Sunday all three goals were down to some woefully slack marking, not least Chelsea's second where no-one bothered marking Alvaro Morata at the back post and even he couldn't pass up that invitation to score.

If Palace struggle to score goals from open play, as they have done this season with just six, they need to be at least solid at the back, especially from set pieces.

MORE: Vote for FYP in the Football Supporters' Federation awards!

3) Townsend can do more

Everyone knows Andros Townsend can do more. Even his dad Troy came on the FYP Podcast and admitted his boy needs to score and set up more goals to add to his industriousness.

On Sunday he did just that with a neat finish into the bottom corner to equalise at 1-1 just after half time. It was his first league goal of the season to add to his two impressive strikes in the League Cup at West Brom.

Players of Andros' ability should be scoring 7-10 goals a season but his highest tally in a season is six for Spurs in 2014/15. He has three already this season maybe it'll be the one where he break double figures. Palace need him to at the moment.

4) Squad depth if not great

Come the hour mark on Sunday Palace were level at 1-1 with Chelsea and looking like the better side. They were just half an hour away from an impressive point against an unbeaten team this season but things changed when the Blues brought on Eden Hazard.

Hodgson didn't quite have the same sort of options, opting to bring on Jordan Ayew at the same time and a short while later Jeffrey Schlupp, while Chelsea also introduced Real Madrid loanee Mateo Kovacic.

Obviously no-one is expecting Palace to match Chelsea in terms of squad options but even by their standards the bench was weak on Sunday. Sorloth, Puncheon, Ayew, Schlupp, Kelly and Reidewald are not players who are going to swing a match your way.

Injuries have robbed Hodgson of the likes of Benteke and Wickham but he desperately needs more game changers in his squad. He can't just rely on Wilf to make things happen.

And Meyer? He didn't exactly prove he is worth a start aside from the first three minutes.

5) It's not all bad

For an hour Palace were in the game and arguably looking more likely to score and they need to take confidence from that. Especially as it came a week after ending Arsenal's 11-game winning run, in a game they really could have actually won.

In patches the Eagles look very good and were it not for some uncharacteristically slack defending they could have come away from Stamford Bridge with something.

There are two more tough games on the horizon but the last two performances should leave Hodgson confident his side can get something from a struggling Tottenham side and a poor Man United outfit.

Stranger things have happened.


 

Palace Ponderings - A 1-0 defeat to Tottenham...again

Written by Naveed Khan

Palace lost 1-0 to Tottenham for the fifth game in a row so here is Nav Khan with some Palace Ponderings..

1. Points Needed Over Praise

Going into the games against Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs and Manchester United, little was expected by way of points. A good performance against Arsenal was followed up with a competitive display for periods against Chelsea and then a subdued match against Spurs.

While in usual context these are seen by many as “free hits”, given the poor results in most of the previous nine games, these are not free hits and points are needed. While some of the play has been encouraging, that is no longer enough.

The praise given to Palace for pushing these teams is not enough. Not getting thrashed is not enough. If we are to avoid a prolonged relegation battle (again), Palace need more than pats on the back for being competitive. We need points. Being brave on the ball and believing we can score would be a start.

LISTEN: FYP Podcast EXTRAAA - Palace lose at home to Tottenham

2. Ayew’s Lack of Engagement a Real Cause for Concern 

This is not a debate on Jordan Ayew’s ability; nor is it a way to dissect Palace’s transfer activity and polices around it. It is not even a discussion around the merits of his overall play against Spurs, which though lacking in key areas, was not in itself the biggest cause for concern on Saturday. It is about awareness.

It is about concentration. It is about wanting to do all you can to stop a goal being conceded. You don’t have to be a Premier League player to have these traits. These exist in anyone who has played a game, from the school playground to the World Cup Final. Ayew’s lack of movement in Spurs’ goal to that end was inexcusable. He didn’t read the game. He didn’t react. He didn’t move.

And, while it may not be true, it looked like he didn’t care. The reaction of the players around him said it all. The very least the team needs in a relegation is battle is for the players to do their upmost to not make mistakes even Sunday League players would be ashamed of. Ayew’s role in Saturday’s crucial goal is a cause for concern.

3. Roy’s Template Needs Adapting

Much is discussed around the formations Roy Hodgson chooses to play and he often labelled “stubborn” or “old fashioned”. However, this season he has been pragmatic in formations. The team has played 4-4-2 with a target man with Wilfried Zaha. And 4-4-2 with no traditional forward. 4-4-2 has been used with one winger and three central midfielders or with four central midfielders across the centre. 4-3-3 has also been used at times.

However, his team selections have rarely matched his formations. He’s used 4-4-2 with players out of position and players on the bench who could fill those gaps. He has used 4-3-3 but with Ayew at the tip.

Roy’s persistence with James McArthur and inclination to use Jeffrey Schlupp from the start or a go-to sub is holding the team back from settling in to a formation and starting XI which can be consistent. With an international break upon us, Roy, Rey Lewington and the coaching staff have the time to work to get this right. 

4. Final Ponderings 

While Wayne Hennessey is much improved this season, albeit from a low bar, there is still little by way of organisation being done and the unit does not seen as tight as it was. Perhaps the time for Vicente Guaita is not far away. Max Meyer evidently has ability on the ball, looks to make things happen but is curtailed somewhat by the role he is being asked to play.

Ruben Loftus-Cheek grew into the role last season as a wide midfielder and hopefully Meyer can follow; however, he needs to shackle loosened somewhat to make that happen and if Wilf is not on the pitch, that is particularly the case.

It seems the penalty miss against Everton has had a profound impact on Luka Milivojević – the last three games have been his best of the season and it seems there is more to come from the captain. 


Zaha's Diving Accusers fit into Three Categories

Written by Jack Snell

Wilfried Zaha was again accused of diving at the weekend, and Jack Snell has had enough of it. 

Wilf stare

The past two weeks have seen the ‘diviest diver in the history of diving’ win two clear cut penalties for Crystal Palace. Of course, this is a reference to Wilfried Zaha. For the first, his leg was taken away from under him after a reckless swipe from Seamus Coleman. The second was clumsy defending from a defensive midfielder forced to play as a left back. However, football pundits and fans (from clubs of all sizes) are still standing firmly behind the conspiracy theory of Zaha ‘always diving.’

Ex Everton player Andy Hinchcliffe had the guile to call the penalty at Goodison Park, ‘a soft one’ during commentary. A soft penalty is a push in the back from a corner, a shirt pull, an unintentional coming together or a handball, not when one leg is forcibly removed from under the body by another player. The bias in football punditry is starting to become tedious and it is this sort of behaviour that allows the spread of false information about players. This bias extends to the likes of Raheem Sterling, who also seems to be the most disgraceful footballer in history according to some tabloids and journos.

The late penalty versus Arsenal was no different as it seemed to ignite a passionate uproar of the ‘Zaha Is a Cheat’ brigade, all rising up with pitchforks raised. Once again the punditry threw question marks in the direction of Zaha for his on-field antics.

The issue is that fans all of other clubs who do not watch Palace week-in and week-out will soak up all this bias and regurgitate these falsehoods with no evidence and no balanced analysis.

Now who are these people? It is likely one of three categories.

1. Jealous fans of other clubs. 

Zaha fouled

No other side outside the top six has a talismanic player to the same degree as Palace have Zaha. West Ham fans will try to argue Marko Arnautovic is one such player, and this argument will, as expected, fall at the first hurdle. Clubs of the same ilk as Palace are OBSESSED with Zaha, namely Palace’s rivals. A Palace fan right now would struggle to name half of the Brighton, West Ham and Watford team because of the simple fact that they do not care.

Grabbing a point against the Premier League’s most in form team must be a hard pill to swallow for some of these clubs, especially with Zaha influencing the final score. So, what is the simplest thing to do? Just call Zaha a cheat to make themselves feel better. The double standards of this is that if Zaha would move to any club in the division then there will be a plethora people having to scroll through their twitter back catalogue and delete the reams of “Zaha hate” that has wallpapered their page for many years.

LISTEN: FYP Podcast EXTRAAA - Luka makes up for penalty miss as Palace hold Arsenal

2. People who know nothing about football. 

Zaha floor

Anyone that has played a competitive game of football to a reasonable standard knows that when you are running at full whack your balance gets somewhat compromised. You are not a solid as when standing still as the centre of gravity is shifting around all over the place. The slightest nudge could send you flying, whereas a static spectator may see it differently.

This is not diving. Zaha was running at Granit Xhaka and he carelessly sticks out a leg. Zaha knows he is going to get a wallop but can do nothing about it. Does he stiffen up his body and allow himself to take the full impact? No, he releases the tension when he gets hit as to protect himself. This makes both his feet come up off the floor, but it is not diving. For anyone who has ever played football and been fouled knows this: if you know you are about to get smashed then you try to protect yourself.

This foul has been conceded countless times on Zaha this season in all areas of the park. It is not such a unique case, Zaha sends the defender one way but goes the other and the trailing leg catches him. Yet it is not until it happens in the box, in the last few minutes, against one of the best teams in the country that he is suddenly a cheat.

READ MORE: Palace Ponderings - Eagles Win a Point in Tough Arsenal Encounter

This is why people know nothing about football because Fulham’s Aboubakar Kamara disgracefully dived against Bournemouth. It was a clear deception, but since he is not Zaha he has got away rather lightly from that whole debacle. From playing football at grassroots level you are told as a defender ‘do not give the striker a reason to go down. Mamadou Sakho’s foul on Mo Salah was a soft penalty to give away Selhurst, but Sakho did exactly that, he gave Salah the opportunity to go to ground.

It is painful as a Palace fan to concede such a goal on the stroke of half time, but this part of the game. Soft or stonewall, it is a penalty if there is contact in the box before the ball, just as it is anywhere else on the pitch. Xhaka said there was contact and no matter how Zaha fell to the ground, it is therefore a penalty.

3. Trolls

Wilf sad

Palace fans are very protective and precious of our boy Zaha, so when people criticise him then these critics are met with a stubborn wall of defensiveness, and rightly so. However, after years and years of false accusations of Zaha’s apparent diving, the Pride of South London have become more frustrated with the naivety and ignorance of those who read something online and conform to the lie that Zaha is a diver.

Since the fanbase has become so passionate about this cause, there is a possibility that trolls are lurking in the depths of Twitter, trying to goad reactions out of Palace fans who have run out of patience. If so, it is working.

Now writing an article about this could be the ultimate victory for the trolls, someone stupid enough to waste their time on this. But, no matter who the haters are, Palace fans know the truth and a few Twitter comments here and there will not change a thing: Palace have the best player outside the top six whether opposition fans like it or not.