Stats can be Deceiving, but Crystal Palace do miss Yohan Cabaye and Ruben Loftus-Cheek

Written by Jack Snell

Following a poll on FYP's twitter account, Jack Snell decided to take a look at two players who appeared to be key last season. Here takes a statistical look at what Palace are now missing. 

With the lacklustre start to the season, Palace fans cannot resist asking the question: ´What is going on?´ After an impressive showing at the tail-end of last season, everyone anticipated that the only way was up. However, it seems Palace are treading in thick, mud. Not making any progress with a string arduous, difficult to watch performances with low energy and creativity. This gets people thinking ´Who are Palace missing this season?´ An FYP poll concluded that RLC and Cabaye could be the answer. Are Palace missing players this season, or is this just one of those things in football?

RLC Clap

Ruben Loftus Cheek:

Ruben Loftus Cheek has been touted as ´one the greatest players to have ever played in a Palace shirt.´ Although he delivered a number of jaw-droppingly good performances, statistically his presence in the team was not as impactful as one would first imagine. First, he missed almost half the season last year. RLC started only 21 games, missing 44% of Palaces games. Cabaye was absent too, but only missed 7 games last season. Palace won 4 premier league games without him in the squad. 

Playing on the wing, one would expect that player to whip in a decent amount of crosses, especially with Benteke fronting the line. However, Ruben only delivered 12 crosses in 1875 minutes of football, 1 cross for every 2 hours and 36minutes. Whereas Andros Townsend, on the opposite flank, delivered a huge 176 crosses in 3129 minutes, one cross almost every 18 minutes! Even Cabaye, McArthur and Luka all delivered more crosses per minutes as central midfielders. It´s no wonder Benteke did not score as much as the 16/17 season (7 headed goals) because with Wilf and Townsend on the wings they delivered almost 400 crosses between them.

Embed from Getty Images

However, Ruben was one of the players with superior pass accuracy and the most big chances created, so there is no doubt that RLC could make things happen. Even if he was not as clinical as one would have hoped, the constant forward and positive thinking must be tiring for defenders to deal with. He had a dribble success rate of 33% - eons better than Wilf (7.1%) and Andros (14%). He clearly terrorised the defences he played against because this season, winning more duals than lost. Schlupp and Meyer have not been close in emulating his strength and power going forward.

The difficulty with RLC was he was injury prone and inconsistent. He was either the most exciting and positive player on the pitch, or a lonely figure, ghosting around the field. This can be seen in the World cup, where he was electrifying versus Panama, but anonymous on both occasions against Belgium.

 

Yohan carrying ball

Yohan Cabaye:

The arrival of Cabaye led fans to believe Palace had finally acquired an attacking midfielder who chipped in around 10 goals a season. However, those expectations were ambitious, he only ever scored over 10 goals in 1 season, almost 10 years ago for Lille. Cabaye however, did not come close to this expectation. He also did not assist enough. 5 assists in 3 seasons is not admirable, especially when Ruben managed 3 in 21 games.

Goal tally and assists aside, Palace received one of their most valuable midfielders in the clubs Premier League history. Cabaye was not only creative, he took his defensive duties very seriously. With a midfield of Ledley, Puncheon and McArthur before his arrival, Palace were masters of the horizontal 10yard pass. Yet his introduction so more positive passing. He was smart on and off the ball and he was also cynical, often taking a yellow card if the opposition looked to break. Like a terrier, he would snap at the opposing players´ ankles and be quick to close gaps in the middle of the field. This cynicism may not always be beneficial as he would often take one too many yellows and therefore have to miss a game.

Embed from Getty Images

Last season he had the most interceptions of the whole team and one of the best pass success rate and passes per game ratio. He also played in 10 out Palace´s 11 victories. On the FYP podcast last year, James McArthur said how the best midfield he had ever played in was alongside Luka and Yohan. Now, there is a Cabaye-shaped-hole in the Palace midfield and Roy is not sure who to plug it with. Schlupp has had an go, Kouyate too and now Max Meyer looks the most likely. If he can emulate the tenacity and creativity of Cabaye it may be as simple as saying: ´problem solved.´

So, stats can be misleading at times and do not paint the full picture of a players season. However, there are some truths to it. Wilf Zaha has recently been rated as Palaces best ever player by peers, pundits and fans and, the stats suggest that he could be. RLC was a player for Palace who the stats are not the kindest towards but having such a domineering, bulldozing player is a big miss. Although Wilf has impeccable balance and a good deal of strength, no other player in the squad possess the power that these two do. With Ruben missing, the flair and strength comes primarily from Wilf. When Bolasie played on the opposite wing, this offered balance to the attack whereas now it is lopsided.

Stats love Yohan, especially the defensive stats. Although there are selection head scratchers for the midfield trio this season, Palace have been defending reasonably well – apart from 2 calamitous Sahko penalties. It is going forward where the Eagles seem to be stale. Cabaye had a good degree of influence on the attacking play of Palace but he was not as much of a focus as Ruben.

It is hard to say if these players would make a difference if still in the squad. There could be a mixture of different reasons such as the departure of Steven Reid, the damning stat of not being able to win without Wilf, Luka´s falling out with the Serbian national team, Roy´s stubbornness when it comes to implementing change, the problem regarding Benteke´s form and confidence. Either way, there is one thing that is for certain; Palace do miss RLC´s good looks, because there has never been a better looking player for the Pride of South London. 

Palace Ponderings - Palace draw with Newcastle leaving more Questions than Answers

Written by Naveed Khan

Palace toiled but couldn't find the winner in what was a close game at Selhurst Park. Here are Naveed Khan's five ponderings about Palace...

Meyer stare

1 – Meyer Has to Start

The ‘Meyer of London’ joined in the summer with a degree of anticipation and excitement; a young international footballer with the ability to play a number of midfield roles. Anyone who has seen Max Meyer’s progress in Germany would have seen his dynamism going forward and pragmatism as he adapted to a deeper role. With Yohan Cabaye and Ruben Loftus-Cheek no longer at Roy Hodgson’s disposal, Meyer appeared to be a player who could fill the shoes of either.

Thus far, he has taken Lee Chung-Yong’s place on the bench with little justification for not starting given the nature of performances this season. It was no coincidence that last season, Wilfried Zaha and Andros Townsend came alive when Loftus-Cheek was back to fitness (who in turn was impactful because of the work Cabaye did). The team is clearly missing exactly the sort of player Meyer is. He simply has to start.

McArthur miss

2 – McArthur is a Conundrum

James McArthur is the prime example of a rejuvenated footballer; surplus to the team which stayed up under Sam Allardyce, his versatility and work rate were embraced by Roy and he was key to last season’s survival. This season, he has again done little wrong. The conundrum comes from how best McArthur fits into the team’s shape.

In a pair with Luka Milivojević, the midfield was left exposed at times. A three with Luka and Cheikhou Kouyaté, is functional but without the guile that Meyer would bring. Wide in a narrow four could be where he fits best though with all players fit would mean leaving out one of Meyer or Townsend. There may be worse problems to have for Roy, but McArthur’s importance in the eyes of Roy makes him a conundrum when the best XI is being picked.

Wilf stare

3 – Attacking Shape Needs to be Based Around Wilf

With Christian Benteke injured, the options to be either a lone striker in 4-3-3 or play alongside Wilf in 4-4-2 are Jordan Ayew, Alexander Sørloth and Andros Townsend; each having their advocates. However, what is clear is that the option picked cannot be on its his own merits as a forward. Whatever their goal-scoring records, whatever their playing style, the one picked has to be the one who allows the team to get the most out of Wilf.

The first manager who did this was Allardyce – moving Wilf between playing left, right and central depending on the opponent to ensure he was most effective. Roy has similarly reduced the defensive role Wilf has to let him focus on what he does best. On Saturday, neither Ayew or Sørloth played in a way to give Wilf the space he needs and Benteke was missed. To an extent, talk about who plays with Wilf and formation is superfluous – it needs to be Wilf centric for the good of the team.

Tomkins dejected

4 – Tomkins and Sakho Partnership is Key

With only one defeat with James Tomkins and Mamadou Sakho starting as a centre-back pairing, their importance goes without saying. The results when just one of them starts points to it being about them as a partnership rather than individuals – with either playing alongside Scott Dann or Martin Kelly, the results do not compare. Against Newcastle, they were critical – all too often teams like Palace can dominate a game but lose against the run of play due to a defensive lapse.

This never looked likely on Saturday, with both dominating defensively, being comfortable with the ball and vitally, they kept their concentration by communicating throughout. They bring the best out of the full backs and importantly, Wayne Hennessey has a greater assurance behind them. In their way, they are as important to the team as Wilf.

Townsend stare

5 – Andros Townsend Continues to be Undervalued

Much has been said about Andros Townsend ‘needing to do more’ and on Saturday, walking away from the game these frustrations were again being voiced. To view his role in how Roy has the team set up on the simple basis of a goals/assists output is to ignore his contribution as part of an effective team unit. Playing on the right side, he has helped in the development of Aron Wan-Bissaka, playing up front his runs with and without the ball helped make Wilf more influential.

Judging purely on goals and assists does not paint the true picture of him – having a more direct or dynamic winger may be more ‘exciting’ but would not be to the benefit of team whole. Against Newcastle, however, he did have an impact going forward – four shots, three key passes and five crosses (of which one should definitely have resulted in a goal ergo an assist for the people judging on that basis). He is an important part of the team and should be valued as such.

Is This the Renaissance of Wayne Hennessey at Crystal Palace?

Written by Bryan Davies

Wayne Hennessey is a player who hasn't always been popular but is now seeing an upturn in support -- Bryan Davies looks at why that might be. 

Few Palace players in recent memory have divided opinion like Wayne Robert Hennessey, but - whisper it quietly - he’s been pretty good lately, hasn’t he? As the giant North Walian approaches 100 Premier League appearances for the club, his form deserves acknowledgement.

There have been echoes of Hennessey’s previous red and blue peak, when eye-catching performances against Everton and Southampton in particular helped Palace to fifth in late 2015. Perhaps we shouldn’t get carried away, though: his nadir came soon after with that error in that game at Aston Villa - a match which signalled the beginning of the slow death of Alan Pardew.

Hennessey’s early season form mirrors his strong end to the last campaign. The value of consistency shouldn’t be underestimated, and his best displays have come when playing behind settled, well-drilled defensive units. The influence of goalkeeping coaches Martyn Margetson and Dean Kiely has evidently been significant, too.

Quality competition helps, and Hennessey has experienced both sides of the coin. Having pushed Julián Speroni to greater heights when signed by Tony Pulis, he now has Vicente Guaita breathing down his neck. There is no comfort zone or margin for error. Such are Guaita’s credentials, everyone knows the Spaniard will be in nets sooner or later.

Hennessey remains fallible. Of course he is - what goalkeeper isn’t? There are goals that better players might prevent, but he makes very few glaring errors. His positioning for the late concessions against Liverpool and Southampton has been questioned, but in mitigation he had been left exposed as the team searched for equalisers.

READ MORE: Tactical Preview: Palace Need Ruthlessness to Beat Terriers

Positioning has never been a strong point. There have been questions, too, about his communication and the way he commands a box. He has been loud and clear thus far this term, though, his voice exaggerated by the deafening silence of a Holmesdale shorn of its Fanatics.

It is surely telling that Pardew, Sam Allardyce, Frank de Boer and Roy Hodgson have all shown great faith in Hennessey, often in times of high stress. Indeed, when planning for a season he never ended up presiding over, Allardyce was happy to pass on the signing of Asmir Begović, preferring to stick with Hennessey and direct funds elsewhere.

Some fans seem to believe, nonsensically, that fame and money insulates footballers from pure human emotions and vulnerabilities, but confidence should not be underestimated. Like Christian Benteke at the other end of the pitch, Hennessey has always struck me as a player who responds best to love and understanding. It’s one thing to be objectively critical, but quite another to jeer, ironically cheer, or post abuse on social media. In bigger picture terms, it is unhelpful in the extreme.

I have never understood why some Palace fans have seemed so personally affronted by Hennessey. Folk like scapegoats, I guess. Does his positioning for free-kicks really warrant wishing him a significant injury? Does a playful video from the Welsh dressing room really make him a c**t? Did he deliberately concede a raft of goal of the season contenders? Rational people know the rational answers to these questions.

Being the man tasked with replacing a club legend between the sticks wouldn’t have helped Hennessey’s cause. Perhaps he got off on the wrong foot by simply being the man on the end of Danny Butterfield’s wonderful, baffling six-minute perfect hat-trick. A popular member of the dressing room, he has never said or done anything to warrant the vitriol he receives from some quarters. He’s no Jordon Mutch.

READ MORE: It isn't Just Zaha Palace Miss, They Do Not Win Without Tomkins Either

It should be noted that for Wales, in a settled and happy squad in which he is a much-loved senior figure, he has been dependably excellent for a number of years. Loyalty means a lot, and Hodgson’s faith will resonate.

There, too, is the broader issue of how goalkeepers are judged. They are a different breed from their outfield brethren, and have come to be viewed as such. The criteria is different, the frames of reference starker; there is no hiding place - one mistake tends to equal one goal, at times undoing months of hard work and goodwill.

There is also the question of what is expected of modern goalkeepers, with many old standards obsolete. The fear of punching is slowly eroding. Custodians are now expected to sweep and address the ball like an outfielder. Risk versus reward. The demands of coaches are changing, but are fan perceptions changing at the same pace?

Hennessey’s time at Palace has been mixed. He is nowhere near as bad as his biggest detractors claim, nor as good as his biggest acolytes suggest. Criticism is valid when it is commensurate, but likewise he deserves credit when he is playing well. From here there are two scenarios: he continues to perform well, or he drops off and is replaced by Guaita. It’s a win-win for Palace.


 

It isn't Just Zaha Palace Miss, They Do Not Win Without Tomkins Either

Written by Jack Snell

"Crystal Palace are a One Man team.”

“Crystal Palace can’t win without Zaha.”

The loss at Southampton provoked, yet again, the unfortunate statistic suggesting that Palace are unable to win without Wilf in the side. Last season Zaha missed 10 games and, of these 10 games, Palace were unable to register a win. It is perhaps the drama of the transfer window; the nonsensical speculation, the poor, shady journalism or even his new, high rolling contract, however the spotlight is rigidly fixed on him. 

Another player spent a lengthy period on the sidelines last season; James Tomkins. His importance has been undercut by the media’s obsession with Zaha. Of the 11 games played without him last season, Palace only won a single game; 2-1 at home versus Chelsea. After that, the next 10 consecutive wins all contained the sturdy centre back.

From 14th October 2017 until today, early September, Crystal Palace have still failed to register a win without James Tomkins’ name on the team sheet.

Of Palace’s 16 defeats last season and 3 this season, Tomkins played in only seven. One of these defeats he was substitutedin the dying embers versus Tottenham and they scored within seconds of his departure. Of Palace’s 16 defeats last season and three this season, Zaha has played in eight.

 

It may be impossible to win without Zaha, however the likelihood of a loss increases without Tomkins. It is important to also note that Palace did not lose a single game when Tomkins and Sahko commandeered the centre of the defence. When looking at these statistics, it can be argued that Tomkins’ presence on the field yields more points/ prevents the loss of points than Zaha’s presence.

Zaha scored three times as many goals as Tomkins last season, however football is not a game that is purely won by scoring lots of goals. This was proven in the 2013/14 season where Liverpool scored 101 goals yet conceded 50. Palace only conceded 48 that season and finished 11th. It is not just goals that puts points on the table.

The defence has to be the foundation on which the team is based on otherwise points will be consistently dropped. Again, using that season as an example; 3rd Place Chelsea were two points behind Liverpool, scoring 30 less goals but conceding almost 50% less. When defenders can regularly produce stand out performances, they can win the team games and save the team points. This was true on countless occasions last season where Tomkins put his body on the line to protect the Palace goal.

He even produced one of the most impressive off-the-line-clearances of the seasons vs Chelsea. Of the defeats Tomkins played in, only one of these games had a 2-goal deficit. So even when losing, having Tomkins in the team can reduce the goal difference. Towards the business end of last season Palace fans were saying how the superior goal difference ‘almost felt like an extra point.’

From 14th October 2017 until early September, Palace have still failed to register a win without Tomkins on the team sheet 

With only a few games left of the season and the league table looking tight, Swansea, Stoke and West Brom were all in the high -20’s while Palace were in the low teens. This is a huge mental boost for the both the players and the fans and should not be under appreciated.

Finally, although only scoring three goals last season he was the highest scoring centre back, since Sahko and Dann only managed a goal a piece. From these three goals, two of them came in victories; Brighton and Huddersfield.

He is an essential player to the team and the results show how he is irreplaceable with the current members in the squad. Although working hard last season, Dann, Kelly, Reidewald, Delaney and Fosu-Mensah all failed to fill his shoes. This could be Palaces’ failure of the summer transfer market as they have not brought in sufficient cover for such an injury. “Crystal Palace can’t win without James Tomkins”


 

Spare a Moment for Those of Us Who Support Palace from Afar

Written by Oliver Nodwell

Palace are a club enriched by their following, whether near or far. Here Oliver Nodwell tells us about his experience supporting Palace from the far reaches of Scotland. 

I can recall the amount of visits to Selhurst I’ve made -- it wouldn’t be too many to count. Originally from the south but spending a fair chunk of my adult days split between the Midlands, Australia, New Zealand, Scotland and on top of that working unsociable hours, I’ve just never managed to make much time. But maybe I have all my priorities wrong.

Split shifts. Chef life. Its 2.52 pm. I rush to the car through the pissing rain and gale force wind. Start the engine and tune in to Radio 5 Live. There’s a faint signal, fading in and out, Mark Chapman’s voice half scrambled. I don’t know why I even bother, no chance its Palace, it will no doubt be a Man United or Chelsea game being transmitted. I’ll have to settle for intermittent score updates amidst all the other matches.

3.04 pm, I arrive back at the house after a twelve minute race through the winding and mountainous A838, overtaking campervan after campervan of tourists from all over the world, tourists who for some reason find it acceptable to drive at 20 in a 60 or just stop right in the middle of the road, on a bend to take a photograph. Tourists who come to see one of the most beautiful parts of the planet. The Scottish Highlands.

Scotland

I tune into a stream online, Radio London, and I sit and listen for the entirety of the game, screaming and shouting at my speaker. In my head, I’m there, at Selhurst or the away stand of whichever ground we’re at that week. In real life, there's a short fat bloke wearing chef whites, sitting in a cottage, eagles soaring overhead, surrounded by countless lochs, mountains and fields on the northwest coast of Scotland.

I’m a twelve and half hour drive away. I’m closer to Oslo than I am to London. I sure as hell can’t supplement cravings with trips to Dingwall to see Ross County.

I suppose the reason i’m writing this is to ask that question, can you be a real Palace (or any club) fan if you don’t often go to games, if you live too far away, or even if you are completely priced out of the live experience due to income and personal circumstance?

To me, its a daily priority to check up on what’s happening with Palace. I visit the club site and social media, endless twitter morons twatting on. I love it.

I watch pre match interviews, post match interviews, even the boring clips of training and players saying “obviously like, the gaffer like, chose me really, so obviously, ill give 100% and hope we come out on top, like, really”. Nonsense, right? But i get a kick out of it for some reason.

But to go to a game is going to cost me a week's wages, at least. It’s just not feasible. I try and do one game a year. I love football, it excites me, to put it plainly. I have tickets to the next away game, not the most glamourous outing but I can’t wait and every time I recall that I’m going or that its a few days closer I get a wee boost. It’s a bit like a upscaled version of when you remember you have a cup of tea that you forgot about.

AWB control

There are a lot of different ways to support your club from afar. I am not, by the way, claiming I am the most distant Palace fan on the earth, I’m sure there are more further away who travel to many more games. I believe I can do a lot better in terms of attendance and I will. Of course it’s possible to be and remain a loyal supporter wherever you are in the World.It makes those rare trips to see the team even more of a pleasure. It’s particularly a pleasure with Crystal Palace. For some reason, everyone has a soft spot for us. I am always proud to say I am a Palace fan.

Having now moved back to a city more connected to modern life than the remote Scottish Highlands, I’ve promised myself I’ll attend more games, home and away. And on Saturday I’ll be racing down the M6, replacing the beaches, lochs and flocks of Scottish sheep with retail parks, service stations and flocks of English sheep. I’ll be excited and nervous no doubt, but that’s nothing out of the ordinary. If I feel the same as I do when I’m screaming at my radio, I can safely say, as a Palace fan, I’m doing alright. Next stop, Hudderfield.

Mon’ the Palace!


 

There Can be a Solution to the Holmesdale Fanatics Issue for Crystal Palace

Written by Robert Sutherland

Crystal Palace released a statement on Sunday evening. FYP editor Robert Sutherland takes a look at the fallout from the HF disbandment and how it can be fixed. 

Flag general story

Everyone is angry and everyone has a perspective on the big issue surrounding Crystal Palace at the moment. The Holmesdale Fanatics, their wish to move to block E of the stand, and the apparent reluctance of the club to commit to it has been the hot topic since it became clear that the group would no longer occupy block B. 

This is a divisive issue. There are factions who think this should be facilitated no matter what. There are others who think that the club shouldn't give in to demands of a small core of fans. There are more who bemoan the lack of an atmosphere as a result of this situation, and there are some who think fans should just step up and do the work of the HF instead. 
 
We have multiple sides, some who support the club's stance (which has only really become apparent since the statement was released yesterday, three months too late) and those who support the HF's stance (although from what we can see, no statement has been released by the group.) And stuck in the middle of all of this are the folks in block E of the Holmesdale, whose views haven't yet been accounted for. 
 
These are the facts as we know them: 
 
  • The HF wished to move to a more central position in the Holmesdale stand. The move had been trialed in a number of cup fixtures and in the Julian Speroni testimonial. 

  • The club appeared to be adaptive to such a move. Plans for this to happen got to a stage where the club were holding back season ticket sales in the Holmesdale, which suggests they were considered to be serious.
     
  • At some point during last season, the club changed its mind. The HF responded by essentially disbanding; members took seats up in different areas of the Holmesdale stand instead.
     
  • As a result of this, the atmosphere at games has taken a significant hit. 
 
There are a number of questions that have come as a result of the club's statement
 
  • Were there face-to-face discussions about the matter? Or were all discussions conducted over email? 

  • Were any season ticket holders in block E consulted about potentially moving seats to accommodate the Holmesdale Fanatics? 

  • Did the club consider any kind of compensation for those fans inconvenienced by such a move?
 
The key line in the statement seems to be that the club were concerned by the 'leak' of season tickets being frozen until a decision could be made. Arguably, the club would have benefited from a more transparent approach to this situation. Had fans in block E been consulted in a more broad way, with a focus on understanding their concerns, there may have been less of a backlash. 
 
There should also be some context here. At the time the club froze season ticket sales, the team were teetering on the edge of a relegation battle. The added spice of a seat move announcement could have made matters worse. Palace would have taken that into consideration. 
 
For the sake of balance however, the fatalistic approach to not finding a solution from the HF is problematic too. The case for such a move hasn't really been made. What benefit is there from such a move? How does it positively impact on the atmosphere. Is this a move that is intended for just the HF, or is there a greater benefit with the establishment of a singing section of the ground? 
 
UPDATE: The Holmesdale Fanatics have, since this article was published, released their own statement, citing their concern for a deterioration in atmosphere at the stadium as a primary concern in their wish to move to a more central part of the Holmesdale. The statement in full reads:
 
"The club and group were working together on proposals for an inclusive singing section to be introduced this season, open to all supporters.
 
"This had twice been agreed to by the club and the HF had submitted proposals to ensure it was inclusive to all fans, with long-term supporters being looked after first. It was never intended to simply swap HF members for existing Block E season ticket holders - and would have been open for all fans.
 
“It was felt this was crucial to the Selhurst atmosphere, which had been going backwards for a number of years and would have created a consistent, supportive environment for the players and club. Using the model that was so successful on the world stage at the FA cup final at Wembley, this was a massive chance to take the club to the next level and create a consistent world class supportive, positive atmosphere”
 
"The group was intending to stay quiet about the issues for the good of the football club and are therefore disappointed that the board have decided to conduct what should have been a private internal issue with public statements essentially painting their own fans in a bad light. The HF feel aspects of the statement are misleading and not representative of the last 12 months discussions.
 
"For example, those in block E know that there was no official consultation regarding this proposal which immediately casts doubt over the rest of the clubs statement being presented as fact. And no real consultation with the real proposals being properly discussed was ever allowed to happen.
 
"The HF are hoping for a resolution to safeguard the massive strengths of Palace's unique supporting culture before they are lost forever.”
 
Ultimately, what all of this seems to highlight is that there needs to be better communication from all parties. The club and the HF have now released statements making their own positions clear. What hasn't yet happened is for there to be a willingness to find a solution in the short and long-term.
 
Arguably the most telling element of the HF statement is their promise for this to be inclusive. It's fair to ask how they will look to do that -- is it reliant on safe standing being approved, for example? How does the club make this possible?
 
There are questions about how this could all be implemented. Areas which the club would likely need to consult on, too -- not just with fans but authorities, also. 
 
  
So what steps can be taken to try to find a solution? 
 
  • The club and HF need to hold face-to-face discussions about this. The impression we get is that discussions were held over email -- which is ultimately an un-emotive way to find a solution to a divisive issue -- words can be harsher and views won't always be listened to. If discussions have been held face-to-face, there arguably needs to be some mediation that represents a broader spectrum of fans. 

  • There needs to be a better consultation of those fans directly affected. The club have season ticket details for those fans -- so ask them the question -- would you consider moving? What would it take? 

  • Consider offering these fans some kind of benefit/compensation for doing so -- what would it cost the club? What kind of benefit does having the most colourful fanbase in the Premier League have? Does one outweigh the other? 

  • Would the HF consider reforming while such a consultation is carried out? If block E season ticket holders refuse to move, would they consider waiting until the new Main Stand is built? 
All of these points aren't resolutions as such but they offer an insight into the matter while temporarily solving the issue of a tarnished atmosphere at Selhurst Park. 
 
We want Selhurst to be a home we can be proud of. The HF helped to make it such a place. A balanced approach to this is needed from everyone -- a solution can be found among the mess that's been created. 
 
This is an emotive issue but transparency from all parties would be a great first step in understanding the problems at the root of it.