Five Things We Learnt: Liverpool 08/11/2015

Written by Robert Sutherland

Unfortunately, a car brakedown put an end to Mark Gardiner's hopes of attending the game at Anfield on Sunday, so Robert Sutherland decided to take a look at five things we learnt from the 2-1 win.

1. Gegenpressing? You've been Pardew'd. Wilf with ball

For all the talk of Gegenpressing - the term used to describe Juergen Klopp's tactical approach - Palace's focus was on a tenacious centre working the ball into the wings.

Whether that was from defence- where Scott Dann and Damien Delaney excelled - or from midfield, where Yohan Cabaye and James McArthur worked themselves into the ground, Palace had a tough core difficult to break down, and wing play that went toe-to-toe with Liverpool's pressure.

And pressure there was. It's not easy for even the most seasoned and cultured midfielders to be confronted by a tight-marking opponent each and every moment they get the ball, but under such scrutiny from Klopp's side, Palace showed a calmness and inventiveness that countered the incessant harrying of their opponents.

Even in spells of Liverpool control, Palace's unit kept a tight, aggressive structure - much to the Anfield crowd's frustration.

2. Dann Omission is a Baffling Blight on Hodgson's England reign

Scott Dann is currently one of the top English centre-backs in the Premier League. A cornerstone in Palace's defensive unit, whether lining up with Damien Delaney or Brede Hangeland, he has been an astounding force in Palace's defence. A defence that currently sees the club lie 8th in the league and that has conceded just 12 goals so far this season - the 5th least amount in the division. 

Yet, despite performances such as this weekend's against Liverpool, or last weekend's against Manchester United, Dann is repeatedly ignored by England manager Roy Hodgson. Of course, England's focus is on building a strong unit of players who understand each other's strengths and weaknesses - but is there really no room for Scott? Especially given Phil Jagielka's injuries? Such a talented defender deserves at least a chance to prove his worth at the highest level. 

3. Wilf was Wonderful 

Tough love was needed when Alan Pardew felt that Wilfried Zaha wasn't doing his job properly - and tough love was what he got. A spell on the sidelines followed, in the hope that it might kick some sense into the winger - and Pardew will be pleased by the results. Wilf has been a dominant force on the wings in recent fixtures, proving a difficult player to mark for both Man Utd and Liverpool defenders. We all know what Wilf is capable of - success in the Championship should have been followed by success in the Premier League, but after that disastrous spell at Man Utd, it has taken him time to adjust to the rigours of Premier League football. 

Fluctuations in form are to be expected - especially given that the player is still only 23 years old - but it was his work rate which was lacking. Not so, now. His effort at Liverpool was there for all to see - and his contribution early in the first half provided Yannick Bolasie with his goalscoring opportunity (via some calamitous defending from Emre Can.) If there's another player who should be pushing for international recognition in our squad, it should be Wilf - he's a player with a skillset that England lack - a direct, fearless streak of creativity. More of the same and who knows?

4. Hennessey Deserves His Place

Palace's win over Liverpool can, in large part, be attributed to the contribution made by Wayne Hennessey. His saves, and general awareness, helped Palace secure the three points against Liverpool. The Welshman made some crucial saves throughout the match.

As a Speroni 'fan' I can understand that Hennessey and Alex McCarthy are somewhat blighted by the fact that they're not Julian - but Wayne has taken his chance and is currently worthy of being Pardew's first choice - even if McCarthy didn't deserve to be dropped initially. 

Pardew says that he's delighted with the depth he has in goal. Some of our fans would do well to heed those words - it's been a while since Palace have had that kind of quality throughout the side - and our goalkeepers should be included in that assessment. 

5. Wickham Return is Pleasing 

Connor Wickham would call the last two months frustrating. Following Palace's win against Chelsea at the end of August - a game in which Wickham played excellently - the striker suffered an injury which seemed to suffer complications - meaning Palace lacked a striker adept at playing the central role in a 3-man attack. While Fraizer Campbell has deputised, and Bolasie and Sako have also had a go, it's been a glaring issue for Pardew and the club. 

Wickham's return to the side as a substitute was a pleasing development - the striker looked a little rusty but now has two weeks more of training to get himself in fighting form. His contribution at Anfield was what was required - a holding, controlling, forceful presence that changed how Liverpool had to defend. It was a pleasing cameo appearance worthy of praise. 

What do you think? Let us know in the comments below or on Twitter.

Who should be Crystal Palace's goalkeeper?

Written by Patrick Stevens

So Jules injured, Alex McCarthy dropped after a couple of mistakes and Wayne Hennessy finally gets his chance. Two clean sheets, and a Welsh international success later, and suddenly people were suggesting we had found our new number 1.

Well, let's take a closer look.

Last season, despite it being our second successful season in the Premier League with one of the tightest defences and a goal keeping legend who won us countless points, there were many calling for Jules to be replaced by Hennessy. Then, in the close season, we went and bought a third keeper and the debate raged even more fiercely. Was Jules' time up? Was it finally Hennessy's time? Who was McCarthy and where did he fit in all this? So, as the new season approached, the battle lines seemed to be drawn for a battle royale.

But then Jules got injured and the argument rather sorted itself out. Jules had to be replaced, and Pards went with newcomer McCarthy, who did well for a few games but then in two consecutive games spilled a shot then let a soft goal in, crucially both leading to 1-0 defeats, and a change was inevitable. Fine margins.

For many that was that, this was finally Hennessy's time. Two clean sheets and a weird dance with Joe Ledley later it was as if the debate was over. And it seemed as if people now accepted This was the new order. So is that it?

Well let's look at the facts.

Firstly, the two games Hennessy got clean sheets against were Watford and West Brom. The former a sterling Dann and Hangeland performance that meant he hardly had a thing to do in either (and some did notice how, in injury time when we needed cool heads, he spilled a routine through ball causing panic and got booked for time wasting adding an extra minute) and the latter the most one sided game seen at Palace in years and something goal keeping coach Woody could have done even today.

So despite the talk not much to back it up, and there was even some comment of a leaden footed keeper in Wales' two nil defeat away the following weekend, but that was forgotten in the heat of Welsh fervour at qualification.

So onwards to West Ham at home. I watched him in the warm up as kick after kick went straight into touch - something that happened again in the match a few times - and worried how he may have been into the rugby World Cup just a bit too much. And then we conceded three so the whole 'he hasn't conceded' line went there and then. Next Leicester. Yes a bad mistake let Vardy in, but many felt Wayne could've done more to make it difficult for him. Many recalled Hazard through in similar circumstances late on v Chelsea at home (and many times after that) when Jules would stop a one on one, and wondered whether the walk wasn't quite matching some people's talk.

But these are all still fine margins and matters of opinion. Although Man City in the cup has revealed the doubts are widespread - to concede five v a top side is always possible but on at least two (and definitely the last one driven straight at him) people feel he isn't either the shot stopper we know Jules to be, nor is he the commanding presence we sometimes feel Jules should be.

McCarthy looked good in many ways but just a few too many wobbles, he looks a perfect reserve to grow and learn.

Wayne doesn't look confident, commanding, or agile. And is shipping goals: nine in his last three.

And then there's Jules. I have to declare my bias at this point; Jules is someone who the mere thought of him moves me to tears of joy, a true legend who loves the club as much as we love him, he has stayed with us, grown with us, and risen to the premiership challenge and excelled. So, I would need a very clear and good reason to drop him just yet.

But, my bias aside, again look at the facts. Despite Hennessy arrival, and some fans haste to criticise our legend, Pards never once wavered in his election of Jules as his no 1 last year. That might tell us a lot. But far more than that, even when Jules was injured, he didn't pick Wayne but went with the untried and untested McCarthy only picking Wayne when he felt forced to. Definitely instinctively Pards' 3rd choice it seems.

And now that Jules is back and available he immediately replaces McCarthy on the bench. Again, a clear indication to me of Pards' rankings in his mind.

So as I see it Pards still sees Jules as one (McCarthy 2 and Hennessy 3rd). And I am sure many agree. Indeed, with a likely removal to the bench or worse, and the euros coming, don't be surprised to see Hennessy move in in a couple of months.

I am loathe to be too hard on any one of them. All three are good keepers and it is fine margins between them. But for me, The other two have had a chance and in circumstances where no one was against them as the legend hadn't been dropped to make way for them. They had their chance and they haven't taken it so, after the debacle v City, with the team in the poorest shape of the season, now is the time for the legend to return.

What bigger lift could we have than Julian Speroni back in the fold on Saturday?

And for those who think it's just sentiment; it not. Just watch the highlights of the last two seasons and see how many times he was crucial to us getting the points. Just see the way the team responds to him and how he demands and gets excellence form those around him. Watch how he and Jedi walked off against Liverpool after Crystanbul. Listen to Pards talk of how the senior pros are the key to our success. Know that if he comes back not only will he give everything he has to the cause, but we will sing that little bit louder, work that little bit harder, play that little bit better, and smile that little bit more.

And anyway, football IS about sentiment, emotion, passion. Don't believe the trite sky induced platitudes that it's just a business. Every true fan knows that's rubbish. That's why Jules has such a special place in our hearts.

So, Alex your time will come, Wayne good luck with Wales, but for me now is a time for getting back to what we do well, with those we know and love. Now is the time for the legend to return.

Now is the time for Julian Speroni.


What's up with Dwight Gayle at Crystal Palace at the moment?

Written by Neil Peters

What’s wrong with Dwight Gayle? Not a tremendous amount. His stats stack up ok and he’s got a goal scoring rate in the Premier League of around 23%, which might not sound fantastic but is the same region as Premier League stalwarts Peter Crouch (25%) and Gaby Agbonlahor (24%).

The main problems with Dwight Gayle are that he’s 26, he’s only played about 100 matches in the Football League or Premier League, he’s only 5ft 9in and it’s 2015.

Let’s deal with his age and appearances first. For his age, he’s got the type of appearance stats of a reserve goalkeeper. There aren’t too many players like Gayle that come into Premier League in their late twenties with limited appearances behind them and make a success of it.  Ings has a comparable number of appearances behind him, but he’s 3 years younger than Gayle. By the time Agbonlahor was 26 he’d played 6 or 7 full seasons in the Premier League. Wilfried Zaha has made 170+ appearances at the age of 22, and we’ve seen his progress year on year.

People rightly point to the success of the likes of Lambert, Vardy, Murray and Austin as strikers that have come into the Premier League in the late summer of their careers, but they are different types of forwards. They lead the line, hold the ball up, and Murray and Lambert in particular are often labelled as the ‘old fashioned number 9s’. 

Gayle is a little man, his attributes lie in his acceleration and his finishing. This is 2015. This is a dying breed of striker. Most teams now employ a big man up front, usually on their own or flanked by wide men – Costa, Gomis, Lukaku are good examples. Even teams with less obvious physical attributes have a striker who can lead the line – Kane, Sturridge, Giroud, Pelle. 

There aren’t too many teams with a little man, although Aguero is an obvious exception, and Arsenal are working with Walcott to find a style that works with this type of striker. Forwards that play like Gayle are often shunted out wide – as Walcott has been for most of his Arsenal career, whilst a recent Palace example would be Sean Scannell who never quite made it as the striker he wanted to be.

With Gayle coming into his late twenties, does he still have the time to develop, by getting enough appearances under his belt in the Premier League to gain the skills and guile that the Murrays and Lamberts honed in the fires of the lower leagues?

It’s been a frustrating two and a bit seasons for Gayle as although he’s racked up 53 Premier League appearances, he’s not started too many, particularly at centre forward. He’s finally been given the chance to put together a run as the starting striker in recent weeks, but has failed to find the net in the Premier League in those games, despite impressive stats against lower league opposition in the League Cup this season.

He was clearly frustrated against West Ham, picking arguments by the antagonistic Adrian in the Hammers’ goal, diving into tackles and generally being a bit nasty. It would not be at all surprising if Gayle had been sent out with instructions to be a bit meaner, and a bit harder. These are the traits of Premier League lone striker. 

He made a couple of bad choices in the match, but I would not hang him out to dry for these. But he still has to prove himself, and he’s probably got 3 months to do so. Gayle was close to joining Norwich at the end of the summer transfer window, but with Murray sold and injuries to Chamakh and Wickham, the Palace hierarchy pulled the plug. It will be interesting to see if an exit strategy is revived in January. 

Follow Neil on Twitter and comment below with your thoughts on Gayley.


 

Five things we learnt: Watford 0-1 Palace.

Written by Robert Sutherland

A ridiculously hard-fought win from Palace, but there were plenty of talking-points from the match. Robert Sutherland takes a look. 

1. Cabaye Loves the Dirty Work

Yohan Cabaye is a class player – he’s brought a certain verve to the way that Palace play, but it’s the lesser-known aspect of his game – the mettle and aggression – that we hadn’t really accounted for. Cabaye has proven to be a formidable presence in our defensive structure – his perfectly-timed tackles, unfettered work-rate and constant harrying of opponents makes him an incredibly frustrating player to face up to. He is, as is sometimes needed in that position, a brilliantly cynical player – knowing just when to commit a foul and when to let play go on. All of these qualities are in addition to his vision, passing and professionalism. What a wonderful addition to Palace’s squad.

2. Depth Matters

It must be terribly frustrating for a player like Joe Ledley – who made such a telling contribution in his first season and a half at the club – to spend much time on the bench or even in the reserves. A player with great quality, he’d likely feature regularly in most sides below 12thin the table. But at Palace, with a player like Cabaye to compete with, it’s understandable that he might not play every game. The same goes for Martin Kelly and Brede Hangeland; neither are first-teamers, although it might be argued that Hangeland deserves to be on current form – but both have done a commendable job for the side. Kelly was highlighted by many as being the poorest player in yesterday’s contest – a criticism that doesn’t account for the way Watford played with two wingers on the left wing – Ikechi Anya being a decent attacking force. All of these players have shown a commendable attitude for Palace – all ready to play when called upon, all performing as required and expected. When injuries come, it’s important to have depth – Palace’s back-up have proven to be highly capable.

3. Gayle Needs Time

It’s easy to blame Dwight Gayle for failing to take his chances against Watford – but he came oh-so-close to doing so, and more games will give him greater sharpness. He led the line as needed, closing defenders down when required, offering himself up as an option on both wings as well as down the centre. The chance that hit the post would likely have gone in had Craig Cathcart not got the slightest of touches just prior to Gayle making contact, and there were a number of other opportunities that, with a little more sharpness, might have gone in. Strikers can sometimes take time to warm up – to get that goalscoring streak going – but there’s little doubt that Gayle could get into the swing of things – he just needs that little bit more faith in his ability.

4. Hangeland Performance Mitigates Need for Additional Defender

We’ve already covered the depth to Palace’s side – but it should be noted just how well Brede Hangeland played. He was strong, patient and observant throughout the match against Watford. He’d also had a decent performance against Tottenham, and has worked well with his defensive partner, whether Scott Dann or Damien Delaney. Clearly there will come a time where changes will need to be made, but it’s clear that Alan Pardew assessed his options and focused on strengthening our midfield and attacking options. On current performances, you can see why.

5. Wing wonders are key to wins

More predictable than any of Bakary Sako, Wilfried Zaha or Yannick Bolasie’s performances, it’s clear that our wingers make a huge difference to how we play. All three played their part on Sunday – putting Watford on the back foot at the right times. While the productivity isn’t quite there yet – Sako seemed intent on running with his head down a little too much, while Yannick toiled too -- the introduction of Zaha made a telling change to how we played. Wilf’s powerful runs – which started from the moment he came on – put Allan Nyom under pressure immediately. It was only a matter of time until a rash challenge would follow, and it just so happened to be in the penalty area. As long as Palace can keep the three players fit, there’ll always be a chance for them to create or a defender to terrify. And what a brilliant thing it is to see, too.

Follow Robert on Twitter @RoDuSu.

Five Things We Learned: Palace 2-0 West Brom

Written by Matt Webb

Great result for Palace. Here's Matt Webb with what we discovered at Selhurst.

Pardew Clap 1

1. Pardew is a master at man-management.

Like any young player Wilfried Zaha is going to have the occasional dip in form and in recent weeks Zaha's form had began to wane, culminating in a lethargic performance against Tottenham Hotspur.  Badly managed, a spell of poor form can stretch over several weeks (we saw what happened to Zaha at Manchester United).  However, Alan Pardew is not one to poorly manage a situation like this -  he is a very strong man-manager who understands his players. Pardew reacted quickly at White Hart Lane and substituted Zaha at half time.  Lesser managers may fear such a decision could humiliate a player, especially dangerous for a player who's known to play at his best when confidence levels are high. But if the manager is able to communicate the decision to the player effectively, ensuring the player understands his manager's thinking, then the outcome can be quite different.  Zaha was subbed at Spurs and was demoted to the bench against Watford, but he has reacted terrificly to Pardew.  Zaha made the difference when he was reintroduced in the second half at Watford and his performance at home versus West Brom today was his best for a long time in a Palace shirt.

2. It takes real quality to break down Pulis' ultra-defensive football

Last season when we 'welcomed' Tony Pulis back to Selhurst Park it was one of the most frustrating matches I had been to.  We were clearly the better team, but two counter attacks from West Brom earned them all three points.  I wanted us to beat Pulis so much, but instead I felt exactly how West Ham fans probably felt when we beat them in similar style under Pulis the previous season.   What we didn't have last season was the quality in the final third to produce that killer pass that splits the otherwise impermeable defence.  This year we have Yohan Cabaye and his assist for the opening goal this afternoon was pure class.  Despite West Brom playing with all 10 outfield players behind the ball, defending in their own penalty area, Cabaye managed to curl in a perfectly weighted ball for Bolasie to head home.  The opening goal changed everything and from that moment Pulis was forced to change tactics to chase the game.

3. The sky is the limit if we bring in a proven goalscorer

Fans have been calling for Dwight Gayle to get a run in the first team, and following his fantastic hat trick against Charlton Athletic, Gayle was given that chance (albeit assisted by injuries to other players).  Gayle was phenomenal against Charlton in the Cup, but was played in a 4-4-2 formation - Palace do not play 4-4-2 in the Premier League, because to do so would expose our midfield, probably to disastrous effect. Gayle does not possess the required attributes to succeed as the lone striker in the 4-5-1 formation that works so well for us.  Alex McCarthyToday, Palace won 2-0 and despite the scoreline and the large number of crosses flying in, Dwight Gayle barely had a touch.  If Palace had a proven Premier League goal scorer who fit within our system, we could have put 5 past Myhill today and if Parish and co can be convinced to spend big in January, this team could achieve anything.

4. Clean sheets, but Hennessey yet to be tested

Who is our first choice goalkeeper? A question that sparks entertaining debate across any pub table in South London and a question which has yet to be answered.  In Julian Speroni's absence Alex McCarthy produced some fine saves that prevented goals, but also made errors that have resulted in goals; after one mistake too many, Wayne Hennessey was given the opportunity.  Hennessey has since overseen our only two clean sheets of the season, but with barely a save to make in each match, he is still relatively untested. At 36, a goalkeeper is certainly not too old, and for me Speroni is still our best goalkeeper, I expect the Argentine to return when fully fit. 

5. "Oh Tony Pulis what have you done"?

When Pulis left Palace so unceremoniously following his Manager of the Season award-winning year, his stock was the highest it had ever been - he must've thought it was a good time to leave as there was no doubt he'd very soon be offered a much higher profile position.  Today, it became clear that it was Palace who have upgraded, not Pulis. West Brom were very poor today, lacking imagination or any form of attacking adventure and were truly dreadful to watch; Contrast that with Palace, now sitting 3rd in the league, fans 'oléing' every pass, absolutely dominating Pulis' West Brom on the pitch as the fans who once sang his name now sung "Oh Tony Pulis, what have you done"?

Crystal Palace securing Yannick Bolasie to a new deal is a sign of club's progress

Written by Robert Sutherland

Yannick Bolasie has signed a new contract. Editor Robert Sutherland has his say on the news. 

We love really good news, us Palace fans. We spent years living off the tiniest of morsels of positivity – a decade of administration woes and Championship anguish meant that transfer news was rarely of the positive variety. But this news, of Yannick Bolasie signing a new 3.5 year deal, means so much to us.

It’s clear that contracts rarely secure anything but value for the player and the club – the player gets a pay rise and the club gets the security and the potential to recoup a significant fee if and when that player is sold – but what a deal does indicate is a shift in momentum. A forward shift – an signal that Palace are a club that players like Bolasie, despite being linked with Spurs and Liverpool during the summer – are happy to stay at Selhurst Park.

Progression for Palace has been significant over the last two and a bit seasons. The Eagles have gone from being relegation favourites to a mid-table side and from a mid-table side to one capable of signing players like Yohan Cabaye – all in two seasons. They key to progression is that, once you sign players like Cabaye, you ensure that the players capable of working alongside him are kept at the club. Signing Bolasie to a new deal ensures that progression. He’s part of what Palace want to build – it’s imperative that we signed him to a new deal.

Bolasie is also integral to the way that we play. His end product can at times be lacking, especially in the goal stakes, but his contribution to matches with the elements that people don’t pay attention to – the endless pressure he puts on defenders, the defensive work he does himself, his positioning and his hold-up play in times of pressure – are crucial to what Alan Pardew wants from a winger. It’s not just about goals, and to suggest it is, is an insult to the work that Bolasie does do.

And finally, praise has to go to the player for his meteoric rise. Starting his career in Malta with Floriana FC, Bolasie returned to the UK to continue his career at Plymouth Argyle, where a few loan spells also followed. When Palace picked him up in 2012 from Bristol City, Bolasie’s career had stagnated and his former club’s fans were, in the majority, relieved that he was sold. He has since taken every challenge he’s faced in his stride, and like Palace, has become an established Premier League entity.

His signing of a new contract is an affirmation of that fact. And we should all be delighted. 

Follow Robert on Twitter @RoDuSu.